Skip to main content

The Long and Short of It

Call it stuffy, but there'a a charm about long-winded sentences. 

People my age - and by that I mean the early-to-mid thirties - have had a disgusting time with school texts, which were expressly chosen for their remarkable abstruseness. Most of us were put off with the language, given the  endless probing into seemingly harmless pieces of text and losing marks to our seemingly erroneous interpretations (at this age, I am told that I am never wrong, I can decipher things the way I want; evidently an adult's imagination holds more value than a teenager's). Abstruse works were seldom long-winded, but vice-versa always held true, and does so - to some extent - even now. Excerpts from classics (I remember Shakespeare's pieces - abridged, they said but that didn't make a spot of difference at that age) lacked any modern adherence to placements and abounded in queer, archaic phrases jumbled in a sentence spanning three lines; we were taught conjunctions like 'nevertheless', 'while', 'meanwhile', 'however', which sounded very adult, but never permitted me to fit my answers withing the designated blank against the respective question. We soon realised, that, while a knowledge of how to score gigantic monsters of sentences is a sign of being erudite and in full command of the language, it is easier to make do with a chipper sentence. Let me rephrase the above, as an example: Sure, you know how to use big words. But please don't. It hurts the brain. 

Having said that, I admit I love fitting a story in a sentence. Surprisingly, there are also present-day authors who pamper my inclinations and resort to a certain level of grandiose imagery. And we all lap it up, with good reason. Take this remarkable excerpt from 'Silkworm' by J.K. Rowling (under the pseudonym of Robert Galbraith): 

"... he was not sure that anything useful would come of this evening's expedition and yet, almost against his will, he was struck anew in the frosty haze, of this winter's night by the aged beauty of the old city to which he owed a divided childhood allegiance."

Nostalgia drips from the above sentence. Also, it would be hard to explain this feeling of gradually becoming aware of the nostalgia, had the sentence been broken anywhere in between. This is the marvel created by Rowling; she can get away with writing complicated text simply because they are offset by the incredible ideas or feelings expressed in them. Also, her stories are never frenzied. They have a measured pace, with pauses for retrospection. Long-winded text only accentuates the same, with good effect. 

Take Haruki Murakami on the other hand; or more specifically, his English translations by Philip Gabriel. One of the key attractions of Murakami's/Gabriel's work is the ridiculously simple tone and flow of words. The sentences are not at all fancy, and like Rowing's, they reflect the same, and in some case, deeper emotions. An excerpt in question, from "Kafka on the Shore' by the same author:

"She starts the engine, turns it off for a time, as if she's thinking about something, then turns the key again and drives out of the car park. That blank, silent interval between leaves you sad, so terribly sad. Like fog from the sea, the blankness wends its way into your heart and remains there for a long, long time. Finally, its a part of you."

The strength of emotions is too primordial, and the simplicity of the words adds to the basal nature of the emotions. 

It would be unfair to compare the two works, being of very different genres. I believe, some part of a reader's appetite for the style of writing is also determined by her life experiences, particularly at the instance of the reading exercise. From a personal point of view, there are days when I'm well-plugged in the flow of life, and well-composed, ornate language acts as an inspiration or a culmination of my complex schedule. Then there are days, when everything becomes a drag; processing anything beyond three words at a go seems like a waste of effort. In the former circumstance, something like a P.G. Wodehouse or an Alistair McLean or a John Le Carre is perfect accompaniment; for all other situations, I would rather settle for a Neil Gaiman, or a Salman Rushdie or a Lee Child. 

Either way, this is really a matter of good fortune that our literary universe - even the modern ones - abound in all forms of writing styles. There are genres, certainly, which get typified by a particular style of writing, which is isn't to say that exceptions do no exist. The current lifestyle we lead - as I am made to believe from the generation before - is far too occupied and would perhaps, find greater solace in simplification. I refuse to believe that in its entirety. Simple writing is not synonymous with simple ideas. Rather, in many cases, its quite the contrary. The length of a sentence is thus a poor proxy for the depth it reveals.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Top 10 books to read when you are depressed

Books are handy weapons to stave off blues - be it the dregs of the Sunday evening or a nasty bout of flu. When you are depressed, it takes herculean efforts to shake off the feeling. And I'm not even talking about the more severe, clinical form of depression. I can't get myself to pour myself a glass of water the day after Diwali; on Fridays on the other hand, I am the epitome of eternal sunshine. For such moody, dull days, these top 10 books are the surest way to dust a little sparkle in your life.
1) Three Men In A Boat (To Say Nothing of the Dog): This is Jerome K. Jerome at his absolute best. It was published some 130 years back and is still capable of eliciting raucous laughter. It is the honest journal of three young, bumbling flatmates and their dog on a river cruise. Look out for some meandering, pedantic pages, but they offer some relief from the relentless humour. 
2) James Herriot'sDog Stories: If you love animals (and dogs, in particular), this is the ultimate…

List#1 The Top Ten Authors I've Read The Most Books From

So I stumbled across this blog The Broke and the Bookish quite by chance (actually I was going through another brilliant blog Fourth Street Review, which led me to TBB). They have an interesting section for Top Tens, and this time it was The Top Ten Authors I've Read The Most Books From. I'm not sure if I can name ten, but let's see here...



Alistair MacLean: Give me a warm-hearted, yet cold-demeanoured, taciturn, multifaceted gentleman, who is also a juggler with words, and a plot set in a crippled ship in hostile waters or a ice-floe or on ragged mountains, and the only other thing I'll ask for is a cup of tea to read it with.

James Herriot: I love animals. Enough said. No, but really, Herriot is the reason I took Library as my preferred choice of 'activity' at school.

John le Carre: God, its depressing to read a le Carre. But its right up there with MacLean. There's something hypnotic about his work and there have been phases when I've read nothing but …

I am currently reading...

The Women Who Run With the Wolves by Clarissa Pinkola Estes. This is proving to be a very empowering read, which I believe was the whole point of the book anyway. For those judge a book by its cover (which is also pretty badass), it really doesn't seem to even skirt the edges of feminism. At its crudest, it is a collection of stories and their analyses to help rediscover what it means to be a woman. If it sounds redundant, then it goes to show howo much we need this book. 
I must say, books of this kind are not up my alley. It feels too verbose (even by my standards) and the bluntness induced by my utter worldly view of things makes it really difficult for me to penetrate the exuberance of being a woman, as noted in the book. I am just three chapters down, so it wouldn't possibly be wise to quote a favourite right now, but La Loba seems very ethereal. The whole concept of some force (our own, presumably) that can join broken, littered pieces, is deeply appealing. 
Newspapers a…