Skip to main content

Does the thickness of books scare you ?


I swear I'm not being diplomatic about this, but the answer to that is 'It Depends. Smiley versus Karla trilogy had me in raptures; I nearly cried (with misery) when I got sent the original version of David Copperfield. Both were bricks; and much as I love Dickens, there is something daunting about a thickset copy with font 8 on a Times New Roman (or something similar).

Thick books (strictly excluding text books) are usually fun. Look at A Suitable Boy; I bought it five years back and I'm still ploughing through. I haven't had the time to finish it or get bored of it (but then I'm a serial book-shifter*). And then there is The Old Man and the Sea; it is a pamphlet of a book, and I haven't (or rather couldn't) finished that either. So it depends on the content of the writing. I'm not saying family sagas are more fun or intellectually more stimulating than, well, an old man fishing in the sea, but somehow, the lack of activity in the latter seemed to deaden my interest in the book. To prove my point, look at Of Mice and Men; its near-about the same size as The Old Man and the Sea and it took me one sitting on a lazy summer afternoon to close it. As an introduction to Steinbeck, I couldn't think of a better way to start (more on that in some other post!). Content is the key. And of course, to a great degree, the reader's propensity to capture the content; though a self-understanding of the same comes only from practice.

Then there's the pace. Lee Child's books only look heavy, same as with Dan Brown, but they really aren't. They are nice and catchy and racy and all that gets to the nerves and makes one turn pages like there's no tomorrow (the stories are also mostly based along similar lines). On the other hand, one has Amitav Ghosh; you simply cannot rush past his words. Each sentence is a story in itself, that has to be chewed and digested before moving beyond the full stop. The content is much heavier and thought-provoking, and hence, despite being similarly placed in terms of physical heft, Ghosh's books take significantly longer and more patience to read.

Of course, the font size is another practical aspect. In all honesty, when Harry Potter and the Cursed Child hit the stores, I was internally chuckling with delight at the decent thickness of the book, imagining all sorts of mind-numbing complications and a sleepless nights, but then, it was truly a disappointment. The formatting of the book was more along the lines of a primary school text book - widely spaced, well-sized fonts, with considerable spaces between consecutive dialogues. Really ? What could have been possibly lost - from a reader's point of view - if it had all been spatially condensed along the same lines as the predecessors? It would have saved space in my bag and hurt my shoulder less.

Biographies, by nature, are meant to be quite thickset. And most of them are extremely interesting, since more often than not, they deal with highly public figures and the lesser known details of their lives (at least the way the subject - if alive - would like the reader to know the same). Which brings me to the conclusion, that fact is stranger than fiction, Unless, one has something as preposterously imaginative as the world of the Middle Earth or the Hogwarts or something out of Asimov, it must be really difficult for fiction based on the existing universe to hold its own for long. Human lives and real-life incidents - perhaps by virtue of their having happened already - generate more curiosity than a make-believe world. That cannot be entirely fitted into a book, however thick it gets, but it barely ever gets dull, unless, of course, there is some deficiency in the writing in itself.

Big books aren't scary but aren't always an indication of good things. Unless one is heaping scores, the intent of the writing and the reader's acceptance for the same (based on prior experiences) would be a reasonable guide to start on one. Sometimes, an affiliation to a particular author would force the readers to gobble up anything and everything - thick or thin - that she/he writes. While that is a very good practice in my opinion, more often than not, not all works turn out the same. Then there's peer pressure and sudden bursts of resurfaced passion about an author or a particular story. There are people in this world who still cannot fathom the craze behind Harry Potter, and several more must have begun digging through the memoirs of Sherlock Holmes only over the last few years. In situations such as these, the thickness of the books mostly becomes secondary; the aim is to finish it before the next round of discussion about the topic starts, lest one is reduced to a mute listener. There is absolutely no need to scorn at this habit - I have seen many a so-called culture-buff snigger at such behaviour - after all, this is what culture is all about. From a movie-making point of view, size of the story is a non-issue. So if an enthusiast, unwittingly, embroils herself/himself into a lengthy book, it really is to the reader's advantage. I had bumped into Sebastian Faulks (Birdsong)) that way, and much as I loved the book, I still prefer the BBC One adaptation which introduced me to the book. But Faulks was a find that I am very grateful for.

Size, thus, need not be a yardstick while reading (or anything in life; though, personally, I've only gotten round to reading), for the love of reading is pretty much blind and weight-inconscious.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Top 10 books to read when you are depressed

Books are handy weapons to stave off blues - be it the dregs of the Sunday evening or a nasty bout of flu. When you are depressed, it takes herculean efforts to shake off the feeling. And I'm not even talking about the more severe, clinical form of depression. I can't get myself to pour myself a glass of water the day after Diwali; on Fridays on the other hand, I am the epitome of eternal sunshine. For such moody, dull days, these top 10 books are the surest way to dust a little sparkle in your life.
1) Three Men In A Boat (To Say Nothing of the Dog): This is Jerome K. Jerome at his absolute best. It was published some 130 years back and is still capable of eliciting raucous laughter. It is the honest journal of three young, bumbling flatmates and their dog on a river cruise. Look out for some meandering, pedantic pages, but they offer some relief from the relentless humour. 
2) James Herriot'sDog Stories: If you love animals (and dogs, in particular), this is the ultimate…

List#1 The Top Ten Authors I've Read The Most Books From

So I stumbled across this blog The Broke and the Bookish quite by chance (actually I was going through another brilliant blog Fourth Street Review, which led me to TBB). They have an interesting section for Top Tens, and this time it was The Top Ten Authors I've Read The Most Books From. I'm not sure if I can name ten, but let's see here...



Alistair MacLean: Give me a warm-hearted, yet cold-demeanoured, taciturn, multifaceted gentleman, who is also a juggler with words, and a plot set in a crippled ship in hostile waters or a ice-floe or on ragged mountains, and the only other thing I'll ask for is a cup of tea to read it with.

James Herriot: I love animals. Enough said. No, but really, Herriot is the reason I took Library as my preferred choice of 'activity' at school.

John le Carre: God, its depressing to read a le Carre. But its right up there with MacLean. There's something hypnotic about his work and there have been phases when I've read nothing but …

I am currently reading...

The Women Who Run With the Wolves by Clarissa Pinkola Estes. This is proving to be a very empowering read, which I believe was the whole point of the book anyway. For those judge a book by its cover (which is also pretty badass), it really doesn't seem to even skirt the edges of feminism. At its crudest, it is a collection of stories and their analyses to help rediscover what it means to be a woman. If it sounds redundant, then it goes to show howo much we need this book. 
I must say, books of this kind are not up my alley. It feels too verbose (even by my standards) and the bluntness induced by my utter worldly view of things makes it really difficult for me to penetrate the exuberance of being a woman, as noted in the book. I am just three chapters down, so it wouldn't possibly be wise to quote a favourite right now, but La Loba seems very ethereal. The whole concept of some force (our own, presumably) that can join broken, littered pieces, is deeply appealing. 
Newspapers a…