Skip to main content

Of Mice and Men - John Steinbeck

Image courtesy: http://www.penguinrandomhouse.com



Genre: Classic, Drama
Rating: 5/5

There is no arguing the sheer brilliance of John Steinbeck. The long list of accolades and the controversy he had courted in his days (some of which still continues) is proof of his influence in the current society. Some deem him (astoundingly) mediocre, partly on account if his opinionated take on events; others, consider his work as American classic. Neither argument is completely false, though I, personally, align myself with the latter. If it would be possible to keep aside for a moment, the political ramifications of Steinbeck's work, one cannot deny the strength of his writings. He does not waste words; his economy only accentuates the somewhat lean personality of the settings and the characters. Everything is stripped unappealingy bare and covered flimsily with sardonic humour. A bit like J.D. Salinger, in some ways, but with a bigger lens on the society.    

The man is a Nobel laureate (the logic of which, too, is widely contested), and his body of work is a perfect illustration of genius, as it is capable of bringing down the esoteric to grass-roots level for the layman. One of the many gems of Steinbeck's treasure is the 100-odd pages long novella Of Mice and Men. The story follows a snippet in the lives of an unlikely pair of friends - the big, beefy Lennie and the scrawny George. Their basis of their association is a mystery, given the dramatic differences in their faculties. But like all things, the society casts a levelling blanket over their strangeness and welcomes them into its treacherous folds. 

Speaking of society, Of Mice and Men is set in the Great Depression years of the US, as are some of his most famous works (The Grapes of Wrath, Cannery Row). Work was tough to come by in those days. Hard times are harder on those with less to lose than others, as was in the case of George and Lennie. Relation amongst men and with labour is a recurring theme with many of Steinbeck's work. This story, similarly, hinges on the nature and compatibility of the two men in a persistently dire situation and the subsequent consequences. 

The length of the story justifies the plot; while some view it as an ending, I see it as a phase in the lives of the protagonists. The language helps, by way of its lucidity, but then that has always been one of the key differentiators of Steinbeck's work in general. Typically, too, Of Mice and Men has its share of horror and cringe in plain sight, but there is something about the honesty of the portrayal so akin to some of our personal experiences - although they may not be at the same scale - which makes the reading so tolerable and at some levels, relatable. 

This is an oft-reviewed book and much loved since it was published in 1937. This was followed by several stage and screen adaptations of considerable merit, but none come close to the writing itself. For the uninitiated, this would be a perfect introduction to the author (as was the case for me, when it blew my mind away one fine summer afternoon many years back).




Got something to discuss about this book ? Feel free to drop a comment; we all here love a bookish discussion...
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Side Reads - A Book of English Essays - Edited by W.E. Williams

Remember our school days? Remember those dreary passages we had to read and read again - between the lines and over and under them? Remember wondering how could the study of language be so dry? Well, it turns out, what we were served was high in protein, but pretty much devoid of spice and juice. Let me set the record straight. Essays are fun. Read A Book of English Essays to see if I'm right.  As the name says, it is a collection of small essays on a multitude of topics by the who's-who of English literature - Francis Bacon, Joseph Addison, Charles Lamb, Leigh Hunt, A.A. Milne, R.L. Stevenson - honestly the list is quite scary. But once you pull your head out of the table of contents, it's a treasure mine. Most essays are short, possibly the length of a newspaper article (which is how they must have been originally published I think). What is interesting though, is the topics they are on. So there are absolutely gorgeous ones like 'Getting Up on Cold Morni...
Post a Comment
Read more

How are rugs and books related

As a child, I was pretty indifferent to rugs or carpets. Back at home, they always existed. They were scrubbed and vacuumed and dirtied and dribbled upon and I didn't quite imagine life without it. Till I moved out.  Basic amenities do not cover rugs, far less, carpets. The first few days I didn't mind, basking in my new-fangled independence, traipsing over bare floors with un-socked feet. Eventually though, the irremovable stains on the bathroom floors made it clear that, in the absence of carpetting, a near-permanent use of slippers is a must. Then came the winters. It brought the chill from all possible directions, including and especially, the floor. The soles of my feet must have been frostbitten on a regular basis and I yearned for the luxury of a nice woolly carpet to sink my feet in. As a conscientious student out making her life (not very successfully), I chose to brave the chilblains (they were not, really).  It wasn't until I was married that ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Long and Short of It

Call it stuffy, but there'a a charm about long-winded sentences.  People my age - and by that I mean the early-to-mid thirties - have had a disgusting time with school texts, which were expressly chosen for their remarkable abstruseness. Most of us were put off with the language, given the  endless probing into seemingly harmless pieces of text and losing marks to our seemingly erroneous interpretations (at this age, I am told that I am never wrong, I can decipher things the way I want; evidently an adult's imagination holds more value than a teenager's). Abstruse works were seldom long-winded, but vice-versa always held true, and does so - to some extent - even now. Excerpts from classics (I remember Shakespeare's pieces - abridged, they said but that didn't make a spot of difference at that age) lacked any modern adherence to placements and abounded in queer, archaic phrases jumbled in a sentence spanning three lines; we were taught conjunctions like '...
Post a Comment
Read more